Chapter 8: Rejection Is Healthy

Our culture tells us to always be positive and accepting of everything — to say yes. But you have no values if you view everything as equally valuable. Values give your life meaning and purpose.

Choosing certain values automatically precludes others. For example, if you choose the value of having a good marriage, you have to reject values that would undermine that, like indiscriminate sex. We’re defined by the values we reject as well as by those we choose. We have to do both.

It comes back to giving a f_ck about some things, and rejecting or choosing to not give a f_ck about others.

The idea of narrowing our options to be happy is counterintuitive — we typically think the path to happiness is having unlimited options and freedom. But meaning comes from caring a lot about select things. Freedom gives you too many options and you end up caring about nothing in particular.

We actually tend to be happier with less. The more options we have, the less satisfied we are with the options we choose, because we keep thinking of the ones we didn’t choose. You keep wondering if you’d be happier with a different choice. Psychologists call this the paradox of choice.

  • When faced with an overabundance of options, some people delay making a choice in order to keep their options open as long as possible, or they avoid commitment.

When you continually chase new experiences, there are diminishing returns — you gain less satisfaction from each additional experience.

  • Traveling is an example. The first country you visit outside your home country makes a lasting impression on you because of your narrower experience. But the dozens of countries you visit after that have less and less impact on you. The same principle applies to acquiring possessions, hobbies, partners, jobs, and friends.
  • The older and more experienced you get, the less significantly each additional experience affects you. You focus more on choosing the people and experiences that bring you the most satisfaction, and reject those that don’t make the cut.

Rather than following the cultural dictate to keep pursuing a broad range of things or experiences, you should focus on a narrower range of things and depth of experience. Prioritize quality over quantity. Here’s why:

  • Commitment to less brings you freedom. It allows you to focus on what’s most important to you and achieve more than you would if your efforts were scattered.
  • Commitment makes decision-making easier and dispels the fear that by choosing you’re going to miss out. When you’re committed to something, you don’t need to keep pursuing more.

Pursuing a broad range of experiences may be useful when you’re young and figuring out what interests you most. But the greatest satisfaction lies in commitment and depth, in your relationships, career and life interests.

Rejection is a Social Skill

Rejection is an integral part of committing ourselves to the values that mean the most to us. In a different way, rejection is also essential in building healthy personal and love relationships.

Rejection is a social skill everyone needs to learn. People try to avoid being rejected or rejecting others because it makes them feel bad.

But if you don’t practice rejection, you’ll get stuck in situations that make you unhappy, although feeling bad is what you were trying to avoid in the first place.

  • Trying to avoid rejecting or confronting anyone and to accept everything is a form of entitlement. Entitled people believe they should feel good all of the time; rejection feels bad, so they avoid it. As a result they become self-absorbed and lack values.
  • Avoiding rejection (both being rejected and doing the rejecting) can make us feel better temporarily, but it isn’t the way to have a meaningful life.

Practicing rejection strengthens our relationships. When we’re comfortable saying no and getting no for an answer, that means our relationship is based on honesty and openness.

  • When Author Mark Manson visited Russia he found Russians to be refreshingly blunt and honest, unlike Americans who always try to be pleasant, and are therefore more superficial.

Superficial communication, which emphasizes appearances (smiling and being polite), developed because it creates economic opportunity: It leads to job opportunities through establishing a lot of superficial connections and improves sales.

However, it’s a dishonest and deceptive way of communicating. We focus on being likable to the point that we change our personality to suit the circumstances. Superficial communication makes us feel insecure because we don’t know what to believe or trust.

Rejection in Love Relationships

An inability or unwillingness to practice rejection leads to unhealthy love relationships. It blurs the boundaries between partners when one or both assume responsibility for the other’s feelings, rather than rejecting that role.

To have a healthy relationship, there must be firm boundaries between the partners and their values. Each person must:

  • Accept responsibility for their problems, and refuse to take responsibility for their partner’s problems.
  • Work on their own problems with the other’s support.
  • Be willing to both reject and be rejected by their partner.

Literature and entertainment extol unhealthy relationships. They promote a notion of romantic love in which two people over-identify with each other. It’s characterized by drama, displays of emotion, and roller-coaster ups and downs.

  • Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet represents the epitome of unhealthy love — which of course ended in tragedy. Some scholars believe the play was written to satirize this concept of love and show how warped it is.

However, romantic love hasn’t always been celebrated. Until the mid-19th century it was viewed as a distraction and an impediment to getting important things done, like farming and other methods of making a living. Most marriages were arranged with economic stability as the priority.

Romantic love can be like an addiction, giving temporary highs but creating long-term problems.

  • It’s characterized by entitlement on the part of one or both people.
  • They either assume responsibility for their partner’s problems, or they hold the other person responsible for their problems. They do this to escape their own problems.

Blurred boundaries are reflected in statements such as: “How could you make me feel so stupid in front of my sister?” “Don’t do that to me again.” “Stop going places without me — you know it makes me jealous.” People who say these things push the responsibility of how they feel to their partners, instead of taking personal responsibility and making a choice about how they feel.

Responsibility-shifting can happen in family relationships too. For instance, a mother fixes all her children’s problems, and they grow up believing others should take care of things for them. (This is why problems in your relationship can echo those of your parents.)

Entitled people blame others or accept blame or responsibility for another because they’re trying to feel loved.

  • If they play the role of victim, someone will save them and they’ll feel loved.
  • If they fix the other person they will be loved and appreciated.

Victims and savers are attracted to each other (people with healthy boundaries don’t interest them), but they end up unable to meet each other’s needs. Each is selfish, and uses the other to get a high.

  • Since the relationship is conditional, they’re afraid it will fall apart if they reject the other’s demands. By contrast when temper flare-ups happen in healthy relationships, feelings may be hurt temporarily but neither is responsible for the other’s feelings.

Maintaining boundaries in a healthy relationship doesn’t mean partners don’t help and support each other. They support each other by choice, rather than due to pressure or a feeling of obligation.

In a healthy relationship, you don’t need to give a f*ck about everything your partner cares about. But you care about your partner regardless. Your love is unconditional.

Building Trust in a Relationship

Trust is a vital component in a relationship. You have to trust each other enough to be honest: to say what you really think and feel, and to tolerate rejection (saying no and hearing no).

That means being honest about even simple things — for instance, in a situation where two people are getting ready to go out, and one asks the other, “How do I look?” Many partners lie to avoid discomfort in answering that question. But honesty in a relationship is more important than feeling good in the moment. Being honest about small things sets the stage for being honest about bigger things.

Conflict and differences also help to build trust. In fact, conflict is necessary because when people can disagree, it means the relationship isn’t conditional or dependent on keeping one or the other happy.

  • If someone always agrees with you, they’re not being honest and you can’t trust what they say. Working out differences openly is preferable to manipulation and dissembling.
  • Rejection is part of building trust. If both people in a relationship cannot say no and accept no in turn, one partner’s values and problems may dominate the relationship.

You can’t have a healthy relationship without trust. If you don’t trust someone, you don’t believe it when they say they love you. Also, you don’t feel loved unless you can trust that it’s not based on conditions.

However, cheating destroys trust. If trust can’t be repaired, the relationship is over.

  • People who cheat are valuing something else more than the relationship. Whatever the value is — validation or power, for instance — it’s not compatible with a healthy relationship.
  • Most cheaters apologize when caught and promise never to do it again, but that won’t fix the relationship. Fixing it, if that’s even possible, is a lengthy and painful process. The cheater needs to uncover and acknowledge the value that broke the relationship, and then decide whether it or the relationship is more important.
  • Next, the cheater needs to build a track record of improved behavior. It has to be a long one — trust can’t be rebuilt without time and painful struggle.

This process applies to repairing any relationship where trust has been broken: The transgressor owns up to the values that led to the rift; and proves he/she values the relationship through improved behavior over time.

You may be able to repair one breach of trust, like gluing a broken plate back together. But if trust is broken again, the relationship (like the previously broken plate) is damaged this time beyond repair.